RSS-Data seems kinda weird to me. Quite a departure from RSS’s ideal of being readable and easy to understand.

Here’s an example of how it will look:

<rss version=“2.0” xmlns:mynamespace=“http://example.com/mynamespace”     xmlns:sdl=“http://example.com/rss-data”>  <channel>   <title>Testing RSS-Data</title>   <item>    <title>A Sample Item</title>    <mynamespace:mydata>     <sdl:struct>      <sdl:member>
      <sdl:name>lowerBound</sdl:name>
      <sdl:value><sdl:i4>18</sdl:i4></sdl:value>
     </sdl:member>
     <sdl:member>       <sdl:name>upperBound</sdl:name>       <sdl:value><sdl:i4>139</sdl:i4></sdl:value>      </sdl:member>     </sdl:struct>    </mynamespace:mydata>   </item>  <channel>  </rss>

How is that easier to deal with than the following?

<rss version=“2.0” xmlns:mynamespace=“http://example.com/mynamespace”>  <channel>   <title>Testing RSS-Data</title>   <item>    <title>A Sample Item</title>    <mynamespace:mydata>     <mynamespace:lowerBound>18</mynamespace:lowerBound>     <mynamespace:upperBound>139</mynamespace:upperBound>    </mynamespace:mydata>   </item>  <channel> </rss>

Or the following, which is way shorter and very readable:

<rss version=“2.0” xmlns:myns=“http://example.com/mynamespace”>  <channel>   <title>Testing RSS-Data</title>   <item>    <title>A Sample Item</title>    <myns:myrange myns:lowerBound=“18” myns:upperBound=“139”/>   </item>  <channel> </rss>